Wendy Williams’ ex files $250M lawsuit demanding her release from guardianship: ‘a weapon, not a shield’
“The guardianship … serves no therapeutic purpose, no protective function. It is punishment—pure and simple.
“Currently, Ms. Hunter is being confined against her will at one of Coterie’s assisted living facilities with restricted access to her own phone and meaningful contact with her friends and family.”
Williams voluntarily entered into the guardianship in 2022 shortly after Wells Fargo bank froze her accounts in January 2022 due to “suspicious activity” and sent a letter to the courts recommending a guardianship.
But Hunter, 52, claims in the court papers Williams – who has been diagnosed with Graves disease, frontal temporal dementia and progressive aphasia – is competent to make her own decisions, but her guardians are ignoring medical advice and keeping her in “fraudulent bondage.”
The lawsuit, which was obtained by The Post, claims Williams has been “subjected to overmedication and undue restrictions of her person,” and remains in care “despite Ms. Hunter passing a competency evaluation in or around March 2025 and being described by healthcare professionals as alert and oriented during welfare checks.”
The lawsuit then notes none of the people looking after Williams have applied to revoke the guardianship.
The suit also describes how Williams spiraled after her divorce from Hunter – who had already started a family with another woman at the time – and was “left to navigate complex financial and medical matters without Mr. Hunter’s experienced oversight.”
It then accuses Schiller and Young of exploiting Williams’ “trust and financial resources,” and spending tens of thousands of her money without her knowledge.
It also claims Williams was “coerced” into the guardianship “under immense financial duress and emotional strain.”
Morrissey, Schiller and Young did not immediately respond to Page Six’s requests for comment.
The lawsuit also accuses the state and defendants of not following proper procedures and legal processes, accuses Morrissey of poor management and the bank of not properly vetting payments she was making.
“Wells Fargo permitted Sabrina Morrissey to liquidate assets and transfer funds, in violation of internal bank policies and fiduciary obligations.





